![]() That intervention is not limited to the websites for which they issued security certificates. That’s the element that gives the issuer the ability to switch any certificate and snoop on anyone’s web traffic. There are multiple parts to security certificates, one being the root certificate of the certificate authority. Google Chrome trusts sixty or so certificate authorities. Including all your bank details, the data on the health website you visited, your chats, or anything else.Ī website’s security certificate is issued by a certificate authority – usually a company. What if someone was capable of switching all the certificates of all the websites you view? Then they can see everything you see. When you visit a website, the padlock in the browser’s address bar indicates it’s encrypted using security certificates. Apple, Google and Mozilla aren’t going to allow the EU to potentially snoop on global traffic. Hence, if the EU passes the legislation as currently drafted, that will result in EU citizens having to download special web browsers. And not just to snoop on their own citizens but on any person using a browser. The EFF and letter authors believe the legislation potentially gives that same ability to any EU government. Whether they do or not is another matter. Many employees are unaware that corporate computers often can do just that – monitor all browser activity. And not just seeing which websites the teens visited but exactly what they looked at and how they interacted. Now imagine an unauthorized third party doing that. According to Pew Research, 61% of parents do so. It’s not uncommon for parents to check which websites their teens visit. Opening the door to Big Brother surveillance Both of the two points covered here are late additions because they are not in the March eIDAS draft. Hence, we are relying on third party statements made in the letter. However, the latest draft is unavailable. Note: we would usually review draft legislation ourselves before publishing an article. Signatories include Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare, the Linux Foundation and Mozilla. The industry letter avoids mentioning snooping but raises concerns about the impact on the security of the internet and the likelihood of fragmenting the internet – some websites may not be available to EU citizens. More than a dozen industry members wrote a separate, less emotive letter objecting to the change that potentially enables web browsing surveillance. It needs to make it compulsory to prevent linking separate pieces of data about an individual.Īmongst the signatories to the letter are the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and hundreds of academics from around the world. And the wallet lacks an important privacy safeguard. The letter asserts the legislation would enable a single government to snoop on all EU citizens’ web browsing. With privacy as one of the key concerns around a digital euro, passing controversial legislation claimed to enable Big Brother surveillance won’t help. However, more than 500 cybersecurity and privacy specialists signed a letter objecting to the draft law shortly before signature. A key part of the new legislation is to provide digital wallets linked to national digital identities. ![]() On Thursday, the EU Council and Parliament reached a provisional agreement on a new framework for a European digital identity (eID) known as eIDAS2.0.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |